city, focusing primarily on innovations in waste management.
[42]
The authors do this through a non-systematic
review using relevant conference papers on sustainability and efficiency of resource utilization. The paper
discusses the key connections between waste management systems (WMS), recycling and circular economy, as
well as plastic pollution. However, research is limited in its extensive or systematic review and lacks consistent
criteria for selecting studies in addition to no formal structure meta-review can be established in the future.
Rodríguez-Guerreiro et al. conducted a Scopus-based literature review on waste management in higher
education institutions, analyzing 293 publications across waste generation and composition, composting, food
waste, and edible food waste.
[43]
The results show a strong increase in research after 2017, with composting
receiving the greatest attention, alongside studies on zero-waste and waste minimization strategies. Hariyani et
al. adopted a systematic review methodology in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines, encompassing the
stages of identification, screening, eligibility, and inclusion.
[44]
Relevant studies were retrieved from the Scopus
database using keyword combinations related to waste management and treatment technologies within titles,
abstracts, and keywords. Following the removal of duplicates, non-English, and inaccessible records, successive
screening and full-text evaluation resulted in a final dataset of 392 articles published between 2000 and 2025,
which were subjected to in-depth analysis. Dawal et al. reviewed 69 studies published between 2018 and 2024
using the PRISMA methodology to examine the application of artificial intelligence, particularly machine
learning and deep learning techniques, in municipal solid waste management.
[45]
The review highlights the
potential of AI to improve decision-making, resource recovery, and circular economy practices, while also
identifying challenges related to data availability, quality, and interdisciplinary integration in achieving
sustainable urban waste management aligned with the UN SDGs. Pardini et al. provide a complete review of
research on IoT architecture and communication protocols in waste management systems.
[46]
This study
examined a series of research papers concerning IoT framework systems for monitoring smart bins and urban
waste. In conclusion, the authors examined how while technological solutions are improving, few IoT systems
really add any extra capability for citizen engagement (which is extremely important to waste collection time
and costs). The gap in the literature is that no design was centered around the human aspect to engage the
community. Anuardo et al. employed a combined research methodology integrating literature review and
content analysis to examine waste management research.
[47]
The literature review facilitated the identification
of research gaps, while content analysis enabled the detection of publication trends, thereby supporting the
qualitative development of policies, initiatives, and a conceptual framework for advancing waste management
research. Sahu et al. reviewed 15 studies examining the application of emerging industrial technologies for
waste sorting in urban systems in India.
[48]
Using content analysis of scientific articles and technical reports, the
authors identified several significant technological innovations in waste sorting practices. However, the study
was geographically limited to Indian metropolitan areas, which the authors acknowledged as a key limitation,
restricting cross-country comparison and broader generalization of findings. Akram et al. provided a review of
ICT applications in waste management with a focus on communication protocols and energy-efficient IoT
deployments.
[49]
The authors highlighted the significance of selecting the appropriate wireless communication
technology in order to optimize the operational life of smart bins, while also recognizing blockchain as a
significant enabler of integrating various stakeholders in a waste-management network. Despite these
contributions, it still seems that there is a gap in the research about how well these ICT have been integrated in
practice from a real-world implementation perspective. Rajeb et al. conducted a taxonomy-driven review of
Internet of Things (IoT) applications in smart cities by retrieving peer-reviewed journal articles from the Scopus
database, selected for its extensive coverage and reliable indexing of high-impact international publishers.
[50]
To
maintain methodological rigor and ensure the quality of the synthesized evidence, the study deliberately limited
its scope to journal articles, notwithstanding ongoing debates in meta-analysis literature regarding publication
type selection, as this strategy was considered most appropriate for developing a robust and comprehensive
taxonomy of IoT-based smart city research.
Ramirez et al.
included a section related to innovative waste systems in their review of articles related to IoT in
smart cities.
[51]
They conducted a review of 22 articles related to the emergence of IoT for smart bins. This review
provided a broad overview of IoT in the smart city ecosystem, but did not provide much technical detail related
to innovative waste systems. The gap in research was that there are no technical specifications for in depth
comparisons to facilitate use in practice Concari et al.
provided a bibliometric and text-mining analysis of 2061
publications assessing citizen recycling behaviors.
[52]
They employed data mining software to identify emerging
trends and thematic associations, and concluded that local city innovative policies were a major influence on
citizen recycling behaviors. The research gap noted in the study was the lack of connections between behavioral
evidence and practical areas of technology in innovative waste systems. D'Amico et al. provides a review that
looks at the digitalization of resource loops in smart cities, focusing specifically on "urban metabolism