| Journal of Collective Sciences and Sustainability
Received: 28 November 2025; Revised: 29 December 2025; Accepted: 31 December 2025; Published Online: 31 December 2025.
J. Collect. Sci. Sustain., 2025, 1(3), 25413 | Volume 1 Issue 3 (December 2025) | DOI: https://doi.org/10.64189/css.25413
© The Author(s) 2025
This article is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC-BY-NC 4.0)
Exploring the Role of AI Tools in Enhancing Human
Creativity in Arts and Music
Israel O. O. Odewole*
College of Human Sciences, Department of Christian Spirituality, Church History and Missiology, University of South Africa (UNISA),
Pretoria, 0003, South Africa
*Email: jesuoluwaobami340@yahoo.ca (Israel O. O. Odewole)
Abstract
This study examines the intersection of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and human creativity, with particular
attention to how AI tools support and expand artistic and musical processes. As AI continues to advance, it is
increasingly woven into creative practices, offering new possibilities that enrich expression and composition.
The study concentrates on three core dimensions: collaboration, inspiration, and the democratization of
creativity. Through collaborative AI systems, Artists and Musicians can interact with machines in inventive ways,
employing generative algorithms to spark ideas and venture into unexplored creative spaces. AI also functions
as a wellspring of inspiration, introducing fresh concepts and methods that push conventional boundaries.
Furth
individuals from diverse backgrounds to engage in artistic work regardless of technical expertise. Drawing on
case studies and creator interviews, the journal explores both the opportunities and challenges of AI-driven
creativity. Ultimately, it seeks to deepen understanding of how AI and human imagination can coexist, shaping
a cooperative environment that enhances the diversity and depth of artistic expressions.
Keywords: Arts, Music, Boosting creativity, Artificial intelligence, Human creativity, Artistic expressions.
1. Introduction
Creativity, broadly defined as the creation of novel and valuable ideas, artefacts, or performances, remains a
central human capacity. Spanning domains from science to the arts, it is highly prized. The ability to generate
unique and significant ideas or artefacts has long been a hallmark of human cognition. Recent advances in
generative AI have significantly expanded computational capabilities. AI can now produce text, images, and
sound that often approach human-like quality. This reshapes how creative work is made, taught, and
experienced. In arts and music, large-scale generative models now craft coherent multi-minute audio,
stylistically nuanced compositions, and rich text prompts that guide ideation.
[1]
However, empirical results
present a complex picture. Though AI can boost productivity and perceived quality in some contexts, it may also
narrow the diversity of ideas and raise ethical and socio- technical issues.
[1,2]
This prompt crucial questions.
Under what circumstances do AI tools enhance human creativity rather than merely automate it or restrict
diversity?
What mechanisms support creative enhancement across disciplines? How can practitioners, educators, and
researchers design humanAI workflows that nurture creative flourishing while mitigating harm? Often seen as
a distinctly human trait, creativity has traditionally been linked to the ability to generate novel and valuable
ideas. In recent years, AI advancements have introduced new methods for bolstering creativity, especially in
artistic fields. Elgammal et al.
[3]
have shown that AI can aid the creative process by providing inspiration,
enhancing artistic abilities, and even producing original works. This paper addresses these inquiries by
synthesizing technical literature, humanAI co-creativity research, and psychological theories of creativity, and
recent empirical studies on AI-supported creative tasks. It also examines how AI tools can enhance human
creativity, assesses empirical evidence in arts and music, and proposes a framework for future tool design and
evaluation.
1.2 Motivation for the study
demonstrated that deep neural networks could learn musical structures from extensive corpora. They produce
harmoniously coherent compositions across instruments and genres.
[4-6]
These systems operationalize
conditional generation, such as text to music, and hierarchical sequence modeling, allowing them to create
multi-minute audio that maintains coherence across sections. Such capabilities were out of reach for simpler
rule-based systems. These models have widened the technical possibilities available to composers and
producers, enabling rapid prototyping and idea generation. Generative AI has emerged as a transformative force
in the arts, facilitating new forms of creativity and artistic expression. Artists increasingly use AI- driven tools
to create music, visual art, literature, and even performances. This technological integration enhances the
creative process. It raises vital questions about authorship, originality, and the artist's role. For example, a recent
study by Elgammal et al.
shows how generative adversarial networks (GANs) can create paintings that rival
traditional artworks, blurring the lines between human and machine creativity.
[3]
In music, AI compositions are entering mainstream channels. Platforms like AIVA and Jukedeck are gaining
traction within the music industry.
[7]
Moreover, the employment of generative AI has sparked debates over
copyright laws and artistic integrity, as legal frameworks struggle to keep pace with technological
advancements.
[8]
As generative AI continues to evolve, it will undoubtedly reshape our understanding of art and
the creative process, challenging both artists and audiences to reconsider what it means to be creative in the
digital age. This study is motivated by the rapid integration of AI tools into artistic and musical practices and the
urgent need to understand their impact on human creativity. Presently, Artists and musicians increasingly adopt
AI tools for inspiration, composition, and experimentation, it becomes essential to examine how these tools
expand creative possibilities without diminishing human agency, originality, or cultural identity. The research
seeks to explore how AI can serve as a collaborative partner-enhancing ideation, refining skills, and encouraging
reflectionwhile addressing ethical concerns such as fairness, authorship, and diversity. Ultimately, the study
aims to ensure that technological advancement supports meaningful, inclusive, and human-centred creative
expression.
1.3 Significance of the study
in analytical framing and evidentiary integration. Most surveys already review AI tools in art and music,
catalogue techniques (e.g., generative models, co-creation systems), or discuss ethical concerns at a high level.
This research stands out in four clear ways
1. Triadic conceptual framework Rather than treating AI-Creativity isn't just about solo genius; it's all about
teamwork, sparking ideas, and making sure everyone gets a say this moves beyond tool-centric taxonomies and
offers a human-centered analytical lens that clarifies how AI intervenes in creative practice, not just where it is
used.
2. Process-oriented focus: Existing studies usually focus on the results (like artworks or music pieces) or the
tech stuff This article foregrounds creative processes-idea generation, exploration, and interaction-showing
how AI reshapes artistic workflows and decision-making.
and musicians to show that a lot of surveys don't have enough solid proof this idea talks about the real-life
teamwork and spark of creativity in the artistic process
4. Democratization as a central analytical theme while access and inclusivity are mentioned in prior work, this
study treats democratization as a core dimension, explicitly analyzing how AI lowers barriers to entry and alters
cultural participation. In sum-
driven creativity as a cooperative humanmachine ecology, supported by qualitative empirical insights rather
than purely technical synthesis.
2. HumanAI Co-creation and HCI perspectives
The field of HCI and music informatics underscores the importance of context in creative processes. For tools to
be truly effective, they must align with the workflows and cognitive models of practitioners.
[9]
Research on
human-AI collaboration suggests that AI excels more as a supportive player, producing raw material and tools that
humans then refine and enhance, rather than replacing human judgment completely. Qualitative research shows
that composers use AI-generated motifs as starting points for their creative journeys, tailoring suggestions to
fit their unique styles, and depending on interactive interfaces for real-time control and understanding. Recent
studies frame fruitful human-AI interactions as partnerships where both parties are creatively involved, not just
replacements. Co-creativity focuses on interactive systems that suggest, respond to, and adapt around human
input, crafting a dynamic loop where human intention and machine suggestions continuously improve the
outcomes. Thorough reviews and recent discussions highlight interaction design, clarity of
explanations, the
precision of control, and meaningful evaluation metrics as central to effective co-creative systems.
2.1 Psychology of creativity
Psychologists examine creative performance as arising from processes like thinking broadly, associative
retrieval, and drawing analogies. AI tools can step in at various stages: by creating broad idea sets, offering
examples based on analogy, or enabling fast iterations and feedback. However, cognitive research also cautions
that ideas from outside sources can anchor human creativity, potentially reducing diversity, as seen in studies
where AI prompts boost perceived creativity but lower idea variety. The psychology of creativity delves into the
mental faculties that enable people to come up with original ideas and effective solutions. Recent findings
highlight that creativity is a learnable skill, not just an innate ability.
[10]
Cognitive flexibility is emphasized as crucial for creative thinking, as it allows individuals to approach problems
from different perspectives.
[11]
Personal characteristics, such as openness to experience, have been highlighted as
significant predictors of one's creative potential.
[12]
The environment is also crucial; places that support and
stimulate can boost creative work by encouraging exploration and collaboration.
[13]
Emerging research
indicates that mindfulness practices, such as meditation, might enhance creative thinking by encouraging
cognitive relaxation and openness.
[14]
In conclusion, understanding the psychological elements of creativity can
shape educational practices and drive innovation forward.
role in enhancing creativity
AI tools have the potential to boost human creativity by acting as partners, not substitutes. Using deep learning
algorithms, AI can sift through vast datasets to detect patterns and inspire new forms of artistic expression. Take
Google's Deep Dream, for example; it uses convolutional neural networks to transform images into dream-like
creations, demonstrating how AI can push creative limits.
[15]
AI markedly enhances creativity across various
fields by serving as a collaborative tool. For instance, systems like DALL-E and GPT-3 can craft original art and
text, broadening creative horizons for artists and writers.
[16]
These tools analyze large sets of data to fuel
new ideas and offer unique insights that human creators might overlook.
Furthermore, AI can handle routine tasks, giving creators more time to focus on conceptual development.
[17]
In
music, AI algorithms like Jukedeck assist musicians in composing by generating melodies and harmonies
tailored to specific styles.
[18]
Moreover, personalization through AI enables a deeper connection with audiences
by curating content that resonates with individual preferences.
[19]
Ultimately, by augmenting human creativity,
AI reshapes the creative landscape, fostering innovation and collaboration across artistic fields. The
Collaborative Workflow Intelligence Framework (CWIF) identifies several critical interaction modes, as
illustrated in Table 1.
Table 1: Key interaction patterns.
Role Distribution
AI Responsibility
Human Responsibility
Information Flow
Process raw data
Validate quality
Decision Authority
Suggest alternatives
Make final decisions
Quality Control
Identify anomalies
Evaluate significance
Knowledge Integration
Extract patterns
Apply domain expertise
Implementation
Execute routine tasks
Oversee complex decisions
3.1 AI in visual arts
In the world of visual arts, AI-powered platforms such as Art breeder have become essential tools for artists,
allowing them to blend various images and styles, thus fostering creativity and experimentation. These
innovative tools enable rapid prototyping and iteration, helping artists delve into a wide array of aesthetic
possibilities and pushing the boundaries of their creativity. Similarly, AI applications like DALL-E have mastered
different styles, broadening the scope of what can be created and shaking up traditional ideas about authorship
and originality. In addition, AI tools spark creativity through generative methods. Consider the collaboration
between artist Refik Anadol and AI, which led to immersive data sculptures that transform public art
experiences. This showcases how AI can be a wellspring of novel artistic expressions.
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is radically changing visual arts, ushering in new experiences and creative
possibilities. Recent progress in machine learning and generative algorithms has led to the creation of AI tools
that assist artists in crafting immersive digital artworks and interactive installations. For instance, AI can sift
through massive datasets to create distinctive visual styles or even aid in composing music that harmonizes
with visual pieces. Moreover, platforms like DeepArt and Runway ML offer artists opportunities to explore
various aesthetics, merging age-old art techniques with contemporary tech. The increasing presence of AI in the
virtual arts scene poses intriguing questions regarding authorship and creativity as the line between human and
machine-generated art becomes increasingly blurred. In essence, AI is reshaping how we perceive artistic
expression in the digital age, going beyond being a mere tool.
3.2 AI in music composition
Artificial Intelligence is making tremendous inroads into the realm of music composition and performance as
well. AI-driven tools like OpenAI's MuseNet and AIVA are capable of composing original music across a variety
of genres, serving as collaborative partners for musicians everywhere. These AI systems leverage machine
learning algorithms trained on extensive musical datasets, enabling them to produce compositions rich with
stylistic nuances and emotional depth. One striking example is AI's role in creating film scores, where composers
draw on AI-generated themes, blending human intuition with algorithmic innovation. This fusion of human and
machine illustrates AI's potential to broaden the creative toolkit available to musicians, enriching the overall
musical landscape. AI is truly revolutionizing music composition, offering composers ground breaking tools to
elevate both creativity and efficiency.
Recent strides in machine learning have fostered the development of sophisticated algorithms capable of
generating original musical pieces in various styles. For example, OpenAI's MuseNet composes music in the
styles of well-known artists, seamlessly blending genres. Similarly, Google's Magenta project explores the
intersection of machine learning and creativity, enabling composers to engage in a creative dialogue with AI.
[3]
AI not only aids in composition, but it also analyzes existing music to discover patterns and trends, helping
composers better understand audience preferences. Additionally, AI tools like AIVA and Amper Music empower
users to craft personalized soundtracks for a variety of contexts, ranging from film scores to video games, making
music composition more accessible even to those without formal training.
[20]
3.3 AI in creative practices and its implications
As AI evolves, it prompts important discussions about authorship and human creativity in music, challenging
traditional understandings while offering fresh possibilities. The integration of AI into creative fields, such as
visual arts, writing, and music composition, is profoundly transforming how creativity is approached today.
As AI technologies grow more advanced, they not only enhance human creativity, but they also challenge
traditional ideas about authorship and originality. For example, AI systems can produce art, music, and
literature, leading artists to rethink the role of technology in creating art. Tools like DALL-E and GPT-4 have
shown that they can create highly engaging visual and textual content, sparking discussions about the
essence of creativity and the importance of the human touch in art.
[21]
Moreover, AI is opening up new ways for
artists and machines to collaborate, resulting in hybrid creations that combine human intuition with the
precision of machines.
This kind of partnership might make creative fields more accessible by providing tools to those without formal
training, thereby expanding the range of voices in art and literature. Yet, these advancements come with ethical
questions, such as copyright and ownership, as well as the potential commercialization of AI-generated art. As
AI continues to progress, its impact on creative practices will spark ongoing debates about the future of artistry
and expression.
[22]
4. AI-driven creativity enhancement
4.1 Ideation: expanding the realm of possibility
Generative AI models can quickly create a variety of ideas, such as melodic snippets, chord progressions, visual
themes, or narrative ideas, which artists can choose to modify and develop. For beginners, this reduces barriers to
entry; for more experienced artists, it encourages creative exploration beyond familiar patterns. Research shows
that using AI-generated ideas tends to boost productivity and the perceived quality of work, especially for those
who are less experienced. In creative writing, AI prompts can enhance novelty and perceived usefulness for
writers, despite a slight decrease in variety. The same principle applies to music: AI-generated motifs serve as
raw material that composers can embrace, modify, or disregard.
4.2 Iteration and rapid prototyping
AI empowers creators to iterate rapidly, allowing composers to experiment with multiple continuations of a
theme, change styles at will, or instantly listen to orchestration ideas. This capability bridges the gap between
an idea and its audible form, encouraging creators to take bold creative risks and supporting the concept of
"thinking through making." Systems equipped with control features, such as temperature, style weights, and
prompt scaffolding, enable creators to blend machine-generated variation with their own intentions.
4.3 Extension & transformation
AI acts as an extension of a creator's skills, empowering non-specialists to undertake tasks that traditionally
demanded training, such as automatic orchestration or timbre design. This democratization of creativity is both
powerful and disputed. While it allows more individuals to create, the socio-technical landscape encompassing
ownership, access, and training data biases influences who stands to gain. Systematic reviews indicate the
promise of AI and the uneven distribution of benefits across populations. Generative models make musical
instruments, orchestral textures, and production techniques accessible to creators without formal
training.
A
songwriter,
for
example,
can
easily
now
prototype orchestrations, experiment with unique instrument
combinations, or create high-quality stems previously requiring specialized studios. This expansion
democratizes the production process and allows imaginative ideas to take precedence over technical
limitations.
4.4 Reflection and critique
Advanced AI systems can offer valuable feedback for creators, like stylistic similarity scores or listener
projections, which encourage reflection and revision. In studio settings, machine- generated critiques or
alternative versions can reveal underlying expectations that spur refinement and innovation, thus transforming
AI into a collaborative partner rather than a mere tool. However, the impact of such feedback hinges on how well
it aligns with the creator's artistic vision.
4.5. Below are four suggested visuals/frameworks.
1. Overall framework: AIhuman creative synergy model
Fig. 1 illustrates a human-centred creative process in which artistic intent initiates collaboration with AI tools.
AI supports ideation by generating diverse possibilities, enables rapid iteration through prototyping and
refinement, and enhances reflection via feedback and pattern recognition. These stages contribute to skill
extension and innovation, ultimately leading to elevated human creative output. The framework emphasises AI
as a collaborative partner that amplifies, rather than replaces, human creativity. AI acts as a catalyst at each
stage of the human creative process : expanding imagination (Ideation), accelerating experimentation
(Iteration), supporting meta-cognition (Reflection), and transferring or extending skills (Skill Extension).
Fig. 1: Conceptual framework of AI-enhanced human creativity in arts and music.
2. Cycle Model: The AICreativity Iterative
Fig. 2 shows the circular diagram layout of iterative AI-human co-creation cycle. Circular arrows indicate
continuous feedback, emphasising that creativity evolves through repeated human-AI interaction rather than a
linear process. This shows the continuous and iterative nature of AI-human collaboration. AI does not replace
creativity but amplifies each phase.
Fig. 2: Iterative AIhuman co-creation cycle.
3. Layered framework: dimensions of ai-enhanced creativity
This can be shown as a four-layer bar or pyramid diagram where each layer builds upon the previous, as
illustrated in Table 2.
Table 2: Four dimensions of AI-enhanced creativity.
Dimension
Human Role
AI Function
Outcome
Ideation
Concept generation
Produces diverse, novel inputs
Expanded creative horizon
Iteration
Refinement and testing
Rapid prototyping and variation generation
Improved quality and innovation speed
Reflection
Evaluation and insight
Analytics, pattern recognition, feedback loops
Informed creative decisions
Skill Extension
Learning and adapting
Tutoring, tool augmentation, style transfer
Skill amplification and hybrid creativity
4. Ecosystem framework: HumanAI co-creative ecosystem
This framework emphasizes that AI and humans coexist symbiotically-AI enhances efficiency and exploration,
while human intuition and emotional intelligence anchor meaning and originality. Fig. 3 illustrates the layered
ecosystem through which AI and human creativity interact in arts and music. AI capabilities, including data-driven
algorithms and machine learning, provide generative and analytical support. The human creative core contributes
emotion, cultural context, aesthetic judgment, and intentional meaning. Through their interaction, a co-creative
process emerges, encompassing ideation, iteration, reflection, and skill extension, leading to creative innovation.
The model emphasises balance, collaboration, and human-centred creativity.
Fig. 3: Ecosystem of humanAI Co-creativity.
5. Evidence from Arts and Music: representative findings
5.1 Productivity and Value
Large-scale studies in visual arts show that artists using text-to-image tools experience increased productivity,
which is reflected in higher engagement metrics on online platforms. However, the novelty and promotional
effects of platforms can complicate any causal claims about these increases. In music, tools like MusicLM
generate high-quality outputs that composers can integrate into prototypes, thus speeding up the creative
process.
5.2 Creativity quality and diversity trade-offs
Experimental studies show that AI can boost the perceived creativity, usefulness, and enjoyment of produced
works, such as stories or musical sketches, especially for creators with less initial creative confidence. At the
same time, relying heavily on AI prompts may limit idea diversity and result in homogenized outputs. This
tendency reflects model biases, making it a recurring issue for tool designers to consider.
5.3 Perception and valuation of AI-assisted works.
Audience studies reveal mixed responses: in some cases, AI-assisted works seem indistinguishable from those
created solely by humans, while in other scenarios, knowing a work's human origin can actually boost its
perceived value. These variations depend on
domain-specific norms, like those of fine art compared to popular music, the transparency regarding AI's Role,
and the cultural narratives around what is considered genuine. Systematic reviews suggest that how we value
these works is heavily influenced by context and how they are presented.
6. Design principles for AI tools that genuinely enhance Creativity
Drawing from both literature synthesis and empirical data, the paper suggests actionable design principles for AI
tools that genuinely enhance Creativity.
6.1 Support controllable exploration
Offer interfaces with adjustable creativity controls, like randomness levels or stylistic constraints, which allow
users to balance novelty and coherence. Systems such as MusicLM highlight the importance of mechanisms
that respect user intent.
6.2 Preserve and increase diversity
Focus on enhancing diversity by incorporating mechanisms that encourage oppositional sampling, multi-
objective generation, or ensemble recommendations. It's been observed that over-reliance on a single AI model
can lead to reduced diversity, suggesting the need for corrective tools. Make sure to provide clear indicators of
how outputs were generated, such as details on training data and applied transformations.
6.3 Transparent provenance and explainability
This transparency builds trust and helps creators make informed decisions about using these creations.
6.4 Embedded learning and skill scaffolding
Include educational modules to explain why certain suggestions are made by the tool. For instance,
understanding the harmonic analysis of a generated sequence can help users grasp underlying patterns,
enhancing their skills and ensuring AI complements human learning rather than substitutes it.
6.5 Ethical, legal, and cultural safeguards
Incorporate safeguards for rights management, bias checks, and culturally sensitive defaults. Past examples of
music systems that closely imitate artists highlight the legal and ethical risks of unchecked generation.
Designers should consider options for revenue sharing and transparency in dataset usage.
7. Practical Advice for Artists, Educators, and Institutions
7.1 For Artist
Artists can use AI to quickly prototype ideas and overcome creative hurdles, but they should critically evaluate
and curate the outcomes. View AI as a collaborative partner: engage with its suggestions, and incorporate human
edits that express personal style. Continue practicing to develop and maintain essential technical abilities.
7.2 For Educators
Educators should integrate AI tools into lessons to assist with composing and critiquing, while promoting
reflective examination of AI-generated materials. Teach students about model biases, sampling methods, and
related legal and ethical issues. Encourage projects that involve both AI-assisted drafts and fully human creations
to support comprehensive skill development.
7.3 For institutions & platforms
Institutions and platforms should prioritize transparent documentation of datasets and establish licensing
frameworks. Support research aiming to develop algorithms that preserve diversity and assessment metrics
that prioritize novelty and cultural diversity. Establish governance structures that involve artists, ethicists, and
technologists in making decisions regarding AI tool deployment.
8. Evaluation: measuring creativity gains with AI
Evaluating the influence of AI on creativity is a complex task because creativity itself comes in many shapes and
sizes and largely depends on the context. Experts advocate for utilizing a blend of methods when assessing
creativity gains:
• Objective metrics include gauges for variety and divergence, scoring novelty against existing works, and
analyzing productivity by counting iterations and ideas.
• Subjective assessments involve expert judges appraising the novelty and value of creative outputs, alongside
self-reported measures such as creative confidence and flow states.
• Ecological indicators focus on whether AI-driven creations are performed, published, or embraced by
audiences, serving as a real-world reflection of creative value.
• Experimental designs need to consider existing skill levels, as research shows AI assistance tends to benefit
beginners more. Thus, detailed analyses stratified by skill are crucial.
9. Conclusion
AI technologies offer immense potential to boost human creativity, particularly in arts and music. These tools
help generate ideas, enable rapid iteration, expand skillsets, and encourage reflection. However, to truly harness
these positive effects, it's essential to address trade-offs involving diversity, interpretability, and fairness. Long-
term and multifaceted research is necessary to evaluate both immediate and lasting creative development effects.
To realize these advantages, thoughtful design must preserve human decision-making, support diversity, and
address potential ethical, legal, and cultural challenges. The best outcome is in designing tools that work
alongside humans, enhancing imagination without overshadowing creators' rights and cultural diversity. We
need ongoing interdisciplinary research, engagement with artists in design processes, and well-thought-out
policies to ensure AI truly stimulates creative advancement. As the relationship between technology and
creativity develops, it's crucial for artists to welcome AI, while also considering its effects on originality,
authorship, and artistic futures. This study concludes with a call to action: to unite technologists, artists, social
scientists, and policymakers in crafting AI systems that truly elevate human creativity in an ethical, inclusive, and
culturally aware manner.
Funding Declaration
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-
profit sectors.
Data Availability Statement
The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study that support the findings are available from
the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Artificial Intelligence (AI) Use Disclosure
The authors declare that artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted tools were used only for language refinement,
grammar improvement, and manuscript structuring purposes during the preparation of this work. All technical
content, experimental implementation, results, and interpretations were independently developed and verified
by the authors.
References
[1]
E. Zhou, D. Lee, Generative artificial intelligence, human creativity, and art, PNAS Nexus, 2024, 3, 052
doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae052.
[2]
A. R. Doshi, O. P. Hauser, Generative AI enhances individual creativity but reduces the collective
diversity of novel content, Science Advances, 2024, 10, eadn5290, doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adn5290.
[3]
A. Elgammal, B. Liu, M. Elhoseiny, M. Mazzone, CAN: Creative Adversarial Networks, Generating "Art"
by Learning About Styles and Deviating from Style Norms, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1706.07068.
[4]
OpenAI, MuseNet, 2019, https://openai.com/index/musenet/, Accessed 1
October 2025.
[5]
Jukebox (OpenAI), Jukebox: A neural net that generates music, https://openai.com/index/jukebox/,
2020, Accessed 1
October 2025.
[6]
A. Agostinelli, T. I. Denk, Z. Borsos, J. Engel, M. Verzetti, A. Caillon, Q. Huang, A. Jansen, A. Roberts, M.
Tagliasacchi, M. Sharifi, N. Zeghidour, C. Frank, MusicLM: generating music from text, 2023, doi:
10.48550/arXiv.2301.11325.
[7]
O. Kruse, The Revolution of Generative AI Music: Opportunities and Challenges, https://www.music-
hub.com/en-blog/the-revolution-of-generative-ai-music-opportunities-and-challenges, 13 August
2024.
[8]
W. Rasenberger, Copyright and Creativity in the Age of AI, 2024 available at
https://www.theregreview.org/2024/01/23/rasenberger-copyright-and-creativity-in-the-age-of-
ai/.
[9]
E. T. Gianet, L. D. Caro, A. Rapp, Human-AI collaboration insights from music composition, GenAICHI:
CHI 2024 Workshop on Generative AI and HCI, CHI / Institutional Repository, 2024,
https://dl.acm.org/doi/fullHtml/10.1145/3613905.3636294.
[10]
M. A. Runco, G. J. Jaeger, The standard definition of creativity, Creativity Research Journal, 2012, 24, 92
96, doi: 10.1080/10400419.2012.650092.
[11]
O. Vartanian, Neuroscience of creativity, In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge
handbook of creativity, 2nd ed., Cambridge University Press, 2019, 148172, doi:
10.1017/9781316979839.010.
[12]
G. F. Burch, J. J. Burch, J. H. Batchelor, Group creative problem solving: the role of creative personality,
Process and Creative Ability, 2019, 23, doi: 10.12776/qip.v23i3.1286.
[13]
M. Awawdeh, L. H. Lian, The relationship of creativity domains with personality traits and academic
environment in higher education, Global Journal of Human-Social Science: G Linguistics & Education,
2022, 22, 67-73, https://socialscienceresearch.org/index.php/GJHSS/article/view/4048.
[14]
Y. Yuan, B. A. Nijstad, Whose ideas get selected? intra-team visibility, idea selection, and team creativity,
2025, 2025, doi: 10.5465/AMPROC.2025.239bp.
[15]
G. McCaig, S. DiPaola, L. Gabora, Deep convolutional networks as models of generalization and blending
within visual creativity, 2016, arXiv preprint, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1610.02478.
[16]
OpenAI, DALL-E: Creating images from text, 2021, https://openai.com/index/dall-e/, Accessed 4
October 2025.
[17]
M. A. Boden, Creativity and Art: Three Roads to Surprise, Oxford University Press, 2010.
[18]
Jukedeck, 2017, Automated music composition with AI, https://www.blu-digital.co.uk/blog/jukedeck,
Accessed 12 October 2025.
[19]
R. Davies, R. Siddique, F. McEvoy, H. Cantekin, J. Hellings, AI and the creative industries, London School
of Economics, Growth Lab, 2025, available at: https://www.economicsobservatory.com/wp-
content/uploads/2025/12/AI_Creative_Industries.pdf, Accessed 13 October 2025
[20]
F. Solomon, The influence of artificial intelligence on music composition and performance:
opportunities, challenges, and ethical considerations, 2025, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.15295637.
[21]
Z. Ivcevic, M. Grandinetti, Artificial intelligence as a tool for creativity, Journal of Creativity, 2024, 34,
100079, doi: 10.1016/j.yjoc.2024.100079.
[22]
O. Hurmuzlu, Ethical Implications of the Commercialization of Artificial Intelligence (AI). In: Al
Mubarak, M., Hamdan, A. (eds) Innovative and Intelligent Digital Technologies; Towards an Increased
Efficiency. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, Springer, Cham., 2024, 564, doi: 10.1007/978-3-
031-70399-7_23.
Publisher Note: The views, statements, and data in all publications solely belong to the authors and
contributors. GR Scholastic is not responsible for any injury resulting from the ideas, methods, or products
mentioned. GR Scholastic remains neutral regarding jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional
affiliations.
Open Access
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which
permits the non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format,
as long as appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source is given by providing a link to the Creative
Commons License and changes need to be indicated if there are any. The images or other third-party material
in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons License, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line
to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons License and your intended use is
not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly
from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this License, visit: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-
nc/4.0/
© The Author(s) 2025
